No Kill NOW!
Home ] Defining No-Kill ] No-Kill Resources ] Shelter Law ]

LEARN ABOUT PETA'S SHOCKING POSITION ON PIT BULLS AND BSL

[../hnavigation.htm]
[../Navigation.htm]
 New Alerts
[../News.htm]
Donate to
Pit Bull Rescue Central

Court Cases...
 

Court Cases

Westbury, NY Court Decision
ADOA  v. Lynnville, MA Court Decision
New York Supreme Court Decision Court Decision
Sheila Tack vs Huntsville, AL

First Decision

Amicus Brief

Supreme Court Decision

NICCHIA v. PEOPLE OF STATE OF NEW YORK. United States Supreme Court Ruling
Tellings v. Toledo Toledo Decision

Appeals Court Decision - 03/03/06 - WE WON!!!

 

Ohio v Cowan The Ohio Supreme Court decision Ohio v Cowan upholds part of Judge Gormans ruling in ACF's challenge that a hearing has to take place to prove a dog is dangerous. If you read the SYLLABUS OF THE COURT below it states 955:22 fails to provide dog owners an oppurtunity to heard on whether a dog is vicious or dangerous under 955:11 (A) (4) (a) that is the section which defines the Pit Bull as "vicious". Before a Pit Bull can be required to be muzzled and insured a hearing will have to take place to determine if its dangerous.

News Story

   
   
   

 

 

Email Webmaster

 
All Rights Reserved. 2005. www.understand-a-bull.com